MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORP DOOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 893691Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Pinsent MasonsFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Heenan BlaikieFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Holland & Knight | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Goodmans LLP | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Arthur Cox | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Mayer Brown | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Pinsent Masons | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 27 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Fasken Martineau | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Heenan Blaikie | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 29 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- James C. MorphySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Keith A. PagnaniSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| James C. MorphySullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Keith A. PagnaniSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 26 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.78 |