WARREN RESOURCES INC WRES (last ticker on record)
CIK 892986Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2014 to Jun 2016
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Cummings & LockwoodFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson & Knight | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Venable LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Patton Boggs | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Cummings & Lockwood | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 29 | 1.07 | 0.49 | 2.03 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan P. BadenVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Melissa L. MongPatton BoggsFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Timothy J. MeltonJones DayFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
- Lloyd H. SpencerNixon PeabodyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Alan L. TalesnickPatton BoggsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Christopher M. KellyJones DayFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Jessica W. HammonsThompson & KnightFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 4.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan P. BadenVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Melissa L. MongPatton Boggs | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 1.10 |
| Timothy J. MeltonJones Day | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
| Lloyd H. SpencerNixon Peabody | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.47 |
| Alan L. TalesnickPatton Boggs | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1.28 |
| Christopher M. KellyJones Day | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Jessica W. HammonsThompson & Knight | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 1.64 | 4.38 |