SPORT CHALET INC SPCH (last ticker on record)
CIK 892907Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Apr 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason R. SchendelSheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Peter M. MenardSheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John H. MullanSheppard MullinFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Su Lian LuCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Charles S. KaufmanSheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason R. SchendelSheppard Mullin | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Peter M. MenardSheppard Mullin | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John H. MullanSheppard Mullin | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Su Lian LuCooley LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Charles S. KaufmanSheppard Mullin | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.85 |