HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS INC HMGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 892822Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- O'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSONFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Bingham Dana | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| O'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSON | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Mark A. WeissKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Paul D. BroudeFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- PAUL D. BROUDE UIREO'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSONFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Mark A. WeissKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Jun 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Paul D. BroudeFoley & Lardner | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.30 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| PAUL D. BROUDE UIREO'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSON | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |