GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL CORP
CIK 892793Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.23 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| King & Spalding | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Thomas A. RichardsonHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- John J. Kelley IIIKing & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Thomas A. RichardsonHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| John J. Kelley IIIKing & Spalding | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 26 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.79 |