TMST, Inc. TMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 892535Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jun 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jeffers, Shaff & Falk, LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.07× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Jeffers, Wilson, Shaff & Falk, LLPFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.18× · Went dark 3.69× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- McKee Nelson LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- FALK SHAFF & ZIEBELLFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 3.05× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Venable LLP | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Heller Ehrman | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Dechert LLP | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Jeffers, Shaff & Falk, LLP | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 12 | 3.07 | 1.89 | 1.27 |
| Jeffers, Wilson, Shaff & Falk, LLP | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 4.18 | 3.69 | 1.38 |
| McKee Nelson LLP | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 53 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.20 |
| Akin Gump | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| FALK SHAFF & ZIEBELL | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 8 | 1.63 | 3.05 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David R. WilsonHeller EhrmanFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Karen A. DempseyOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David R. WilsonHeller Ehrman | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.56 |
| Karen A. DempseyOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.41 | 1.24 | 1.00 |