MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORP MATK (last ticker on record)
CIK 892025Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Whiteford Taylor & PrestonFirst linked Apr 2003 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Whiteford Taylor & Preston | Apr 2003 | Text search only | 35 | 1.16 | 0.48 | 1.42 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2002 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William I. IntnerHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Michael J. SilverHogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William I. IntnerHogan Lovells US LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Michael J. SilverHogan & Hartson | May 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.39 |