BOOMTOWN LLC
CIK 891552Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Watkins Ludlam Winter & StennisFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- LATHROP & GAGE LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Jones Walker | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Baker & Daniels | May 2010 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 223 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.97 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | May 2010 | Text search only | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Watkins Ludlam Winter & Stennis | May 2010 | Text search only | 32 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| LATHROP & GAGE LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 50 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.52 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Irell & Manella | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ashok W. MukheyIrell & ManellaFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Alvin G. SegelIrell & ManellaFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashok W. MukheyIrell & Manella | May 2004 | Text search only | 12 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Alvin G. SegelIrell & Manella | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 11 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.79 |