STERLING BANCSHARES INC SBIB (last ticker on record)
CIK 891098Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke LordFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Snell & Smith, P.C.First linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bracewell & GuilianiFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Lord | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Bracewell LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Snell & Smith, P.C. | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bracewell & Guiliani | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 13 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 2.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.68×
- William C. McDonaldAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
- Dan A. FleckmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.77×
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- William T. Luedke IVBracewell LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.68 |
| William C. McDonaldAndrews Kurth LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 2.02 |
| Dan A. FleckmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 2.77 |
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.11 |
| William T. Luedke IVBracewell LLP | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |