DYNACQ HEALTHCARE INC DYII (last ticker on record)
CIK 890908Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2003 to Oct 2012
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Axelrod, Smith & KirshbaumFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.First linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Axelrod, Smith & Kirshbaum | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.89 | 1.50 | 0.69 |
| Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 1.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian P. FenskeNorton RoseFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Robert D. AxelrodAxelrod, Smith & KirshbaumFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Thomas C. PritchardBrewer & Pritchard, P.C.First linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 1.95× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian P. FenskeNorton Rose | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Robert D. AxelrodAxelrod, Smith & Kirshbaum | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.96 | 1.20 | 0.44 |
| Thomas C. PritchardBrewer & Pritchard, P.C. | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.54 | 1.95 | 1.99 |