SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL SCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 89089Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Baker BottsFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Locke LordFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, L.L.P.First linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Baker Botts | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 0.98 |
| Locke Lord | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jan 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.59 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.26 |
| Liddell, Sapp, Zivley, Hill & LaBoon, L.L.P. | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.20 | 1.15 | 0.43 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan J. LynchLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2026 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Jamie L. YarbroughBaker BottsFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jonathan DeSantisShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- J. Eric JohnsonWinston & StrawnFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.48×
- Arthur H. RogersFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- SETH A. KAPLANWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan J. LynchLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2026 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.83 |
| Jamie L. YarbroughBaker Botts | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Jonathan DeSantisShearman & Sterling | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| J. Eric JohnsonWinston & Strawn | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.83 | 1.51 | 1.60 |
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | Oct 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.48 |
| Arthur H. RogersFulbright & Jaworski | Sep 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| SETH A. KAPLANWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |