UROPLASTY INC UPI (last ticker on record)
CIK 890846Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Messerli & Kramer P.A.First linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Lindquist & VennumFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 101 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 91 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Messerli & Kramer P.A. | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.64 | 1.65 | 1.40 |
| Lindquist & Vennum | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 101 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William E. McDonaldOppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas MartinDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jeffrey C. RobbinsMesserli & Kramer P.A.First linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William E. McDonaldOppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas MartinDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Jeffrey C. RobbinsMesserli & Kramer P.A. | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 1.66 |