McAfee, Inc. MFE (last ticker on record)
CIK 890801Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Jan 2008 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- HYNES & LERACHFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Jan 2008 | Text search only | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| HYNES & LERACH | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.77 | 1.35 | 1.43 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert S. TownsendMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Michael RinglerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Jack HelfandWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.51× · Went dark 3.58× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. KennedyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Kurt BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert S. TownsendMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.79 |
| Michael RinglerSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Jack HelfandWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 4.51 | 3.58 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. KennedyShearman & Sterling | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 20 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Kurt BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.96 | 0.99 | 1.45 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |