RAMP CORP RCO (last ticker on record)
CIK 890784Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2004 to Nov 2005
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Warshaw BursteinFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 3.08× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Krieger & PragerFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Warshaw Burstein | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.47 | 3.08 | 1.72 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Krieger & Prager | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 38 | 0.90 | 2.16 | 1.69 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Martin Eric WeisbergJenkens & GilchristFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Peter B. HirshfieldWarshaw BursteinFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.87× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Steven E. SegalCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Samuel M. KriegerKrieger & PragerFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Eric WeisbergJenkens & Gilchrist | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.44 | 2.08 | 1.56 |
| Peter B. HirshfieldWarshaw Burstein | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.71 | 1.87 | 1.55 |
| Steven E. SegalCooley LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.94 | 1.25 | 0.92 |
| Samuel M. KriegerKrieger & Prager | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 1.16 | 2.27 | 1.66 |
| Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein Sandler | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 32 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 1.42 |