ALLIED HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL INC AHCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 890634Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & SteinerFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Baer Marks & UphamFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Dow LohnesFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ettore A. SantucciFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.09 | 0.57 | 1.47 |
| Baer Marks & Upham | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.23 |
| Dow Lohnes | May 2002 | Text search only | 36 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Ettore A. Santucci | May 2002 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Proskauer Rose | May 2002 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David K. LakhdhirPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.23 |