Everforth Inc EFOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 890564Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.28 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- James E. ShowenHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David T. YoungGunderson DettmerFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.77× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| James E. ShowenHogan & Hartson | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David T. YoungGunderson Dettmer | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.19 | 2.77 | 1.35 |