Vertex Energy Inc. VTNR (last ticker on record)
CIK 890447Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 1996 to Jan 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- The Love Law Firm PC.First linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- The Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- COX CASTLE & NICHOLSONFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| The Love Law Firm PC. | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.63 | 1.73 | 1.27 |
| Faegre & Benson | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| The Loev Law Firm, PC | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.07 |
| TroyGould PC | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
| COX CASTLE & NICHOLSON | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Jonathan R. ZimmermanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- John S. GilliesThe Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- David M. LoevThe Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Lawrence P. SchnappTroyGould PCFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew R. PaceyKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2025 | Named in a filing | 72 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Jonathan R. ZimmermanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.45 | 0.55 | 1.56 |
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| John S. GilliesThe Loev Law Firm, PC | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.80 | 1.66 | 1.41 |
| David M. LoevThe Loev Law Firm, PC | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 1.12 |
| Lawrence P. SchnappTroyGould PC | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.63 | 0.98 | 2.08 |