SATCON TECHNOLOGY CORP SATC (last ticker on record)
CIK 889423Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- O'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSONFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| O'CONNOR, BROUDE & ARONSON | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bradley A. JacobsonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Jonathan BellGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Neil H. AronsonGennari Aronson, LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- NEIL H. ARONSON UIREMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.87×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley A. JacobsonGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Jonathan BellGreenberg Traurig | May 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Neil H. AronsonGennari Aronson, LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 0.43 |
| NEIL H. ARONSON UIREMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 2.87 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |