LITTELFUSE INC /DE LFUS (last ticker on record)
CIK 889331Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- McKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| McKenna Long & Aldridge | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.33 | 0.27 | 1.02 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- David BrownMcKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2017 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Mark F. VeblenWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| David BrownMcKenna Long & Aldridge | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.75 |