ISCO INTERNATIONAL INC ISOO (last ticker on record)
CIK 888693Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2000 to Feb 2009
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence D. LevinKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence D. LevinKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.75 |