FIBERMARK INC FMKIQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 887591Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- White & CaseFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| White & Case | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Fried Frank | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 540 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 0.86 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.70× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Peter B. TarrHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 1.38 | 1.70 | 0.54 |
| Peter B. TarrHALE AND DORR | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.60 |