HAMPSHIRE GROUP LTD HAMP (last ticker on record)
CIK 887150Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2005 to Jun 2015
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Francis E. DehelBlank RomeFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 2.54× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Mark A. CognettiWillkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Steven J. GartnerWillkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francis E. DehelBlank Rome | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.15 | 2.54 | 0.42 |
| Mark A. CognettiWillkie Farr | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 1.08 |
| Steven J. GartnerWillkie Farr | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.33 |