AVON PRODUCTS INC AVP (last ticker on record)
CIK 8868Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Aug 2008 to Jul 2018
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| White & Case | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Powell Goldstein | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ting S. ChenCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Edward P. SmithChadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Sarah BesharDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Katherine M. KoopsPowell GoldsteinFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Erica H. SteinbergerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.64×
- Joshua TinkelmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ting S. ChenCravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Edward P. SmithChadbourne & Parke | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Sarah BesharDavis Polk | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Katherine M. KoopsPowell Goldstein | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 41 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 1.34 |
| Erica H. SteinbergerLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 9 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 3.64 |
| Joshua TinkelmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 2.11 |