20230930-DK-Butterfly-1, Inc. BBBY (last ticker on record)
CIK 886158Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2014 to Sep 2023
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Waller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Burnet Duckworth & PalmerFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Farris LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 76 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 1.20 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Burnet Duckworth & Palmer | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Farris LLP | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Christina M. ThomasKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Tamar DonikyanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Francesca L. OdellCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Frank J. LopezProskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Peter G. SamuelsProskauer RoseFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Elizabeth Gonzalez-SussmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Christina M. ThomasKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | — | 1.03 |
| Tamar DonikyanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 1.01 |
| Francesca L. OdellCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Helena K. GrannisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 29 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Frank J. LopezProskauer Rose | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Peter G. SamuelsProskauer Rose | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Elizabeth Gonzalez-SussmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |