GENERAL CABLE CORP BGC (last ticker on record)
CIK 886035Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Blank Rome | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.65 | 1.38 | 2.34 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Fennemore Craig | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank RomeFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- John D. LobranoSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Jeffrey M. TaylorBlank RomeFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert Evans IIIShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Alan H. LieblichBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Richard G. SchmalzlGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEYFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 3.45× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
- Ellen J. OdonerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Palat MurawskyBlank Rome | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 29 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| John D. LobranoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Jeffrey M. TaylorBlank Rome | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 0.00 |
| Robert Evans IIIShearman & Sterling | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Alan H. LieblichBlank Rome | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.83 | 1.58 | 1.48 |
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| Richard G. SchmalzlGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.29 | 3.45 | 2.64 |
| Ellen J. OdonerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |