GLOBAL ENTERTAINMENT CORP GNTP (last ticker on record)
CIK 885780Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Sanders (US) | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher D. JohnsonSquire Sanders (US)First linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 2.14×
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher D. JohnsonSquire Sanders (US) | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 2.14 |
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.08 |