GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CORP
CIK 885538Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Dechert LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Edwards & Angell | May 2004 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2001 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carol Anne HuffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- John D. LaRoccaDechert LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- G. Daniel O'DonnellDechert LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carol Anne HuffKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| John D. LaRoccaDechert LLP | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G. Daniel O'DonnellDechert LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |