Eco-Shift Power Corp. ECOP (last ticker on record)
CIK 885475Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 1998 to Dec 2000
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pearlman Schneider LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & HirschtrittFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearlman Schneider LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.34 | 1.79 | 1.41 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Nelson Mullins | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| McCarter & English | May 2007 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt | May 2007 | Text search only | 20 | 0.67 | 1.43 | 1.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Steven E. SiesserLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James M. SchneiderSchneider Weinberger LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.69 | 2.51 | 1.47 |
| Steven E. SiesserLowenstein Sandler | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.08 | 0.62 | 1.10 |