GULF RESOURCES, INC. GURE (last ticker on record)
CIK 885462Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jul 2011 to Nov 2025
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Han KunFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Eaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Breslow & Walker, LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fennemore Craig | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| Han Kun | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Eaton & Van Winkle LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.35 | 1.45 | 1.17 |
| Breslow & Walker, LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frank J. MarinaroLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Eric DoeringLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Gary T. MoomjianMoomjian Waite & ColemanFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 4.57× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank J. MarinaroLoeb & Loeb LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Eric DoeringLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.41 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.34 | 2.27 | 1.56 |
| Gary T. MoomjianMoomjian Waite & Coleman | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.58 | 4.57 | 0.81 |