OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS OISI (last ticker on record)
CIK 885317Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Dec 2006 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Perry-Smith LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 55 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| White & Case | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Duane Morris | May 2008 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Vedder Price | May 2008 | Text search only | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Perry-Smith LLP | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 32 | 0.66 | 0.42 | 0.50 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Thomas P. ConaghanMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Oliver C. BrahmstWhite & CaseFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| Thomas P. ConaghanMcDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Oliver C. BrahmstWhite & Case | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 11 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 2.03 |