CYNOSURE INC CYNO (last ticker on record)
CIK 885306Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| Jones Day | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Edwards & Angell | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Andrew BonnesWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Andrew BonnesWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 1.01 |