HOME DIAGNOSTICS INC HDIX (last ticker on record)
CIK 884909Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Satterlee Stephens LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Satterlee Stephens LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.33 | 0.36 | 1.31 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Clifford E. NeimethGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Edwin T. MarkhamSatterlee Stephens LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzie | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Clifford E. NeimethGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Edwin T. MarkhamSatterlee Stephens LLP | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |