TNFG Corp TNFG (last ticker on record)
CIK 884892Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Neal Gerber & EisenbergFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Woltjen Law FirmFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C.First linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.91× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes & Thornburg | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Neal Gerber & Eisenberg | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Woltjen Law Firm | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.95 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C. | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 27 | 2.91 | 1.08 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin WoltjenStrasburger & PriceFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ronald L. BrownAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.30× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin WoltjenStrasburger & Price | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.89 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Ronald L. BrownAndrews Kurth LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 4.30 | 1.75 | 1.19 |