Liquid Media Group Ltd. LBIX (last ticker on record)
CIK 884247Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2015 to Aug 2023
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Miller ThomsonFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- DuMoulin BlackFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Miller Thomson | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| DuMoulin Black | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 1.46 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark D. WoodKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
- W. Scott WallaceHaynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- LESTER R. WOODWARDDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 1.21× · 95% wipeout 3.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark D. WoodKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.79 |
| W. Scott WallaceHaynes and Boone | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.08 | 1.45 | 0.80 |
| LESTER R. WOODWARDDavis Graham & Stubbs | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.47 | 1.21 | 3.61 |