BELL SPORTS CORP
CIK 884063Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- McDonald CaranoFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- HASKELL SLAUGHTER & YOUNGFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| McDonald Carano | May 2010 | Text search only | 59 | 1.33 | 1.06 | 1.26 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| HASKELL SLAUGHTER & YOUNG | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 25 | 0.97 | 1.85 | 0.63 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ROBERT W. KADLECSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Carl MarcellinoRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBERT W. KADLECSidley Austin | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 6.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Carl MarcellinoRopes & Gray | May 2010 | Text search only | 32 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.22 |