UROLOGIX INC ULGX (last ticker on record)
CIK 882873Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2004 to Mar 2016
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Lindquist & VennumFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 101 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Lindquist & Vennum | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 101 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan M. GilbertMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- April HamlinBallard SpahrFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Charles P. MoorseLindquist & VennumFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.69× · 95% wipeout 3.48×
- Thomas G. Lovett IVLindquist & VennumFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan M. GilbertMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.96 | 1.14 | 1.59 |
| April HamlinBallard Spahr | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Charles P. MoorseLindquist & Vennum | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 3.48 |
| Thomas G. Lovett IVLindquist & Vennum | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.72 |