IMMTECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. IMM (last ticker on record)
CIK 882509Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. ZupponePaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Keith D. PisaniPaul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. ZupponePaul Hastings | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Keith D. PisaniPaul Hastings | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.34 | 2.27 | 1.56 |