SPATIALIGHT INC HDTV (last ticker on record)
CIK 881468Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Feb 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2004 to Dec 2007
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Franklin, Cardwell & JonesFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 3.36× · 95% wipeout 2.14×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 2.62× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Boylan, Brown, Code, Fowler, Vigdor & Wilson, LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.59×
- Vigdor & WilsonFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.59×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin, Cardwell & Jones | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.33 | 3.36 | 2.14 |
| Bryan Cave | Aug 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman LLP | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.40 | 2.62 | 1.40 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Boylan, Brown, Code, Fowler, Vigdor & Wilson, LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.83 | 0.00 | 2.59 |
| Vigdor & Wilson | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 2.59 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Paul Hastings | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- KEVIN A. COYLEDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.36×
- Bradley J. RockDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 3.80×
- Scott M. StantonMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEVIN A. COYLEDLA Piper | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.99 | 0.00 | 4.36 |
| Bradley J. RockDLA Piper | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.79 | 1.93 | 3.80 |
| Scott M. StantonMorrison & Foerster | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 28 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 2.43 |