SCICLONE PHARMACEUTICALS INC SCLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 880771Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- VENTURE LAW GROUPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Oct 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| VENTURE LAW GROUP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.32 | 1.04 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. SteinDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Eric WangDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Edward BattsDLA PiperFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Howard ClowesDLA PiperFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. HOWARD CLOWESDLA PiperFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. SteinDLA Piper | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Eric WangDLA Piper | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 0.95 |
| Edward BattsDLA Piper | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Howard ClowesDLA Piper | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 3.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. HOWARD CLOWESDLA Piper | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |