GENTA INC DE/ GNTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 880643Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Emilio RagosaMorgan LewisFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Richard A. DruckerDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Randall B. SunbergMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Ethan E. ChristensenCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio RagosaMorgan Lewis | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Richard A. DruckerDavis Polk | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 0.53 |
| Randall B. SunbergMorgan Lewis | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 0.35 |
| Ethan E. ChristensenCooley LLP | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 |