DAEGIS INC. DAEG (last ticker on record)

CIK 880562Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Jun 2015
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 7; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Nov 24, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 14, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 4, 2015Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 17, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 16, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 8, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 1, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 18, 2011Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 7, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Dec 6, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 11, 2005An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jul 30, 2003An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jul 17, 2003An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
May 20, 2002SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
May 20, 2002An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Nov 2015	Named in a filing	741	1.31	0.12	0.76
Locke Lord	Oct 2015	Named in a filing	179	1.70	0.54	1.00
K&L Gates	Apr 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	723	1.06	1.35	1.18
Wiggin and Dana	Apr 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	56	0.82	0.30	1.37
DLA Piper	Aug 1998	Named in SEC correspondence	1,184	1.00	0.45	1.20
Baker & McKenzie	May 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	587	1.07	0.72	1.00
Piper Rudnick	Oct 2005	Text search only	183	1.09	0.37	0.82

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Nov 2015	Named in a filing	25	1.90	0.00	0.39
Eugene W. McDermott Jr.Locke Lord	Oct 2015	Named in a filing	12	0.55	0.00	0.00
GILLES S. ATTIAGraham & James LLP	Oct 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	5	1.76	0.00	3.34
Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA Piper	Dec 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	17	0.71	0.00	0.92
Jude M. SullivanHoward and Howard	Apr 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	8	0.00	0.00	0.00
Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana	Apr 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	22	0.39	0.00	1.34
KEVIN A. COYLEDLA Piper	Jul 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	5	3.99	0.00	4.36
PAUL A. BLUMENSTEINDLA Piper	Mar 2000	Named in a filing	9	2.25	1.54	0.00
Peter M. AstizDLA Piper	May 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	22	1.51	0.77	1.41