Perfumania Holdings, Inc. PERF (last ticker on record)
CIK 880460Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Aug 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jan 1999 to Apr 2017
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke LordFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in a filing · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Edwards Wildman PalmerFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Carlton FieldsFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Lord | Oct 2017 | Named in a filing | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Edwards Wildman Palmer | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.88 | 0.43 | 0.80 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.38 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Carlton Fields | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 47 | 1.34 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Littman Krooks | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Akerman LLP | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew C. DallettLocke LordFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.61×
- Alan H. AronsonAkerman LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Michael W. HeinGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.96×
- Brian J. WalshGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- KENNETH C. HOFFMANGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- David A. ZagoreSquire Sanders (US)First linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 3.94× · 95% wipeout 3.87×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew C. DallettLocke Lord | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.11 | 1.45 | 2.61 |
| Alan H. AronsonAkerman LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Michael W. HeinGreenberg Traurig | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 2.96 |
| Brian J. WalshGreenberg Traurig | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| KENNETH C. HOFFMANGreenberg Traurig | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| David A. ZagoreSquire Sanders (US) | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 9 | 1.24 | 3.94 | 3.87 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |