MISONIX INC MSON (last ticker on record)
CIK 880432Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Wilk Auslander LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- SILLER WILKFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Hartman & Craven LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2021 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
| Wilk Auslander LLP | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 1.34 | 1.03 |
| SILLER WILK | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.95 | 1.07 | 0.95 |
| Hartman & Craven LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark BekheitLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Michael GrundeiWiggin and DanaFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Joel I. FrankWilk Auslander LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.80×
- Edward I. TishelmanHartman & Craven LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark BekheitLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 18 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.96 |
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |
| Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Joel I. FrankWilk Auslander LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 3.09 | 0.00 | 2.80 |
| Edward I. TishelmanHartman & Craven LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.87 |