CLAYTON WILLIAMS ENERGY INC /DE CWEI (last ticker on record)
CIK 880115Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- COTTON, BLEDSOE, TIGHE & DAWSONFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| COTTON, BLEDSOE, TIGHE & DAWSON | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.24 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shane M. TuckerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Jim PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- William R. VolkVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shane M. TuckerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| Jim PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| William R. VolkVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.79 |