WABASH NATIONAL Corp WNC (last ticker on record)
CIK 879526Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Sep 2004 to Jul 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | May 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason M. HilleFoley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- William I. IntnerHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Michael J. SilverHogan & HartsonFirst linked May 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason M. HilleFoley & Lardner | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| William I. IntnerHogan Lovells US LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & Hartson | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
| Michael J. SilverHogan & Hartson | May 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.39 |