SEEN ON SCREEN TV INC. SONT (last ticker on record)
CIK 879519Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- The Law Office of Conrad C. LysiakFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- MICHAEL GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATESFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 3.05× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Law Office of Conrad C. Lysiak | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 115 | 0.69 | 1.57 | 0.76 |
| Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 67 | 2.28 | 1.77 | 1.64 |
| MICHAEL GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 39 | 1.43 | 3.05 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- CONRAD C. LYSIAKThe Law Office of Conrad C. LysiakFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- David J. KatzPerkins CoieFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- Jeffrey MallerFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Michael A. CaneCane Clark LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONRAD C. LYSIAKThe Law Office of Conrad C. Lysiak | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 81 | 0.95 | 2.16 | 0.98 |
| David J. KatzPerkins Coie | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.55 | 1.24 | 2.28 |
| Jeffrey Maller | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 15 | 0.62 | 2.55 | 0.88 |
| Michael A. CaneCane Clark LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 57 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 0.76 |