WIRELESS TELECOM GROUP INC WTT (last ticker on record)
CIK 878828Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in a filing · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morrison Cohen LLPFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McCarter & English | Aug 2018 | Named in a filing | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Reed Smith | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Morrison Cohen LLP | Sep 1999 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.77 | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| Bryan Cave | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Victoria R. WesterhausStinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward P. Bromley IIIReed SmithFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Gerard S. DiFioreReed SmithFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert H. CohenMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Anthony J. MarsicoGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 3.57× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria R. WesterhausStinson Morrison Hecker | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward P. Bromley IIIReed Smith | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.33 | 1.55 | 1.46 |
| Gerard S. DiFioreReed Smith | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Robert H. CohenMcDermott Will & Emery | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.74 | 0.39 | 2.04 |
| Anthony J. MarsicoGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 33 | 0.38 | 3.57 | 1.29 |