POLYMEDICA CORP PLMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 878748Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| HALE AND DORR | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Steven M. PeckWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul BerkowitzGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.53× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- THOMAS L. BARRETTE JR.HALE AND DORRFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 2.83× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Steven M. PeckWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul BerkowitzGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.53 | 0.71 | 0.32 |
| THOMAS L. BARRETTE JR.HALE AND DORR | Sep 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.74 | 2.83 | 1.06 |
| Stacy J. KanterSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 73 | 1.60 | 0.31 | 0.58 |