MANOR CARE INC HCR (last ticker on record)
CIK 878736Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | May 2001 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Reed Smith | May 2001 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2001 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2001 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Michael D. LevinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick H. ShannonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Michael D. LevinLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2001 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |