FINLAY ENTERPRISES INC /DE FNLY (last ticker on record)
CIK 878731Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 1998 to Aug 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Tenzer Greenblatt LLPFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 2.64× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
- Zimet, Haines, Friedman & KaplanFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.03× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Tenzer Greenblatt LLP | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.72 | 2.64 | 3.54 |
| Zimet, Haines, Friedman & Kaplan | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.02 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Susan S. AncarrowTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- James Martin KaplanTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Edwin S. MaynardPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- JAMES M. DUBINPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan S. AncarrowTroutman Sanders LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| James Martin KaplanTroutman Sanders LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.04 | 1.78 | 1.88 |
| Edwin S. MaynardPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| JAMES M. DUBINPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 2.49 |